I don't know what I was thinking when I said I wanted to go to TAFE next year and do a Certificate III in Commercial Cookery. I absolutely cannot and will not go anywhere where I have to touch, smell, taste, or be near meat on a daily basis. I can't even look at it without holding a silent memorial for the poor animal that died a cruel and merciless death, simply to satisfy the sadistic hunger pangs of us mortal humans.
But it also physically disgusts me too. I remember, at fat camp, we were served a plate of chicken. There was nothing on the plate but two clean pieces of chicken. From memory, they looked like large drumsticks, and they were bald. In my mind, I envisioned a dead chicken being plucked of all feathers and cleared of any imperfections, and all that was left ended up on my plate. I looked at it with nothing more than disgust, and it was right then and there that I transitioned into being a full-blown vegetarian.
But if the memory of that mutant-looking chicken wasn't enough to put me off working in the kitchen, on Friday, when I decided to become a cook — that night another cook sent me meat when I ordered vegetarian Mexican food. I was violently ill once I realised what it was, and I think it took just a little while for the penny to drop that I could never survive in a kitchen.
I want to learn to make nice, warm, home-cooked meals for my mother and my future husband, but I am going to do that on my terms. God knows what kind of horrific things would happen in the kitchen at Regency Park TAFE.
My detour into cookery put me back on the right path — the path I was already on. I am an artist and a writer, and I don't really need to formalise that, but I want to.
So here is the final plan:
Tomorrow, I’ll begin an Undergraduate Certificate in Fine Arts through Curtin University — a quick qualification that I’ll complete early next year. It will strengthen my applications for grants and help support my creative ideas for now.
Next year, at the end of February, I will start a Bachelor of Fine Arts at Adelaide University so I can just get the degree. It will be a secondary thing — I'm not going to hang around at the uni or be part of the community. I’m going to go there for classes, patiently sit it out, do the work, and get the degree.
I want that piece of paper, but most of all, I want to spend that time learning how to become a professional glassblower. I want to become a glassblower so I have a skill to earn money, but my real creative vision is my projects about colonialism, genocide, apartheid, statelessness, and inequality.
But here’s the thing — I can't earn money from that kind of artwork. It would be unethical, and I don’t want money that comes from other people’s suffering. That means I need a skill like glassblowing to fund the real artwork. The other way I can fund my other work is by applying for grants, which is why my Undergraduate Certificate is going to help me until I get the degree.
I know I’m older. I'll be 45 next year. I know I’ve literally wanted to try every single career known to man, and I’ve started every training course and degree too. But I feel like I’ve trained my whole life for this. It is a natural fit for me.
So art is my thing. But I have just spent all my money on a trip to Botswana in December, and I’m going to need some more money — and fast.
I’ve always wanted to wait tables. It’s a dreamer’s job. Actresses and artists work as waiters and waitresses while they’re waiting for their true passion to come to fruition. And I want to do that.
So I’ve enrolled in a couple of short hospitality and first aid courses for the remainder of the year, and I’m going to get a small but hopefully employable skill set where I might be able to get a job at one of the large hotels. I have to get a job where I work at least 40 hours a week, and I think I can do this. I am up for the challenge.
Ideally, I wouldn’t have to work. I want to work on my projects about Australian colonialism in Papua New Guinea and Blackbirding, Aboriginal deaths in custody, and also the situation in Gaza. I want to read books about them, research at the library, and create artworks that make people think differently about these things.
I worked it out, and I really need grants of about $120,000 a year. I know that’s a lot, but I could really make something special with that amount and I could pay myself too. I would also do neon work and finish my book in Cambodia with that money.
To get the grants, I think you need a body of work, which I don’t have. So while I’m waiting tables, I’m going to spend the rest of my time creating original pieces of artwork.
Interestingly, I was telling my brother about all my letter-writing projects last night. I explained it was a form of conceptual artwork. He then proceeded to give me a lecture about how he “knows a thing or two” about conceptual artwork — and said my letters are not original or artwork at all.
My letter-writing projects are a form of conceptual artwork. They are driven by investigation, process, dialogue, and interconnectedness, exploring how power, silence, and response shape human experience. Each letter is both a question and an answer — and every reply, whether given or withheld, becomes part of the work itself. Together, these projects sort of form a kind of self-portrait, because the letters and responses are a direct reflection of my own curiosity and questioning. For me, the meaning lies not just in the physical letters but in the relationships and systems they reveal.
It’s not about how beautifully something is painted or sculpted — it’s about what the work makes people think, feel, and question. The process, the story, and the intention are just as significant as the final thing on display.
My brother’s “understanding” of conceptual artwork didn’t stop at my work. He brought up a piece called “Comedian,” 2019 by Maurizio Cattelan, an Italian conceptual artist. It’s simply a banana duct-taped to the wall.
It became one of the most talked-about artworks in the world — not because of the banana itself, but because of what it revealed about the art world, value, and meaning.
The banana was never about the banana — it was about ideas of value, ownership, and absurdity in the art market. Cattelan wanted to highlight how art’s “worth” isn’t in the material but in the concept and the economy around it. When collectors bought the banana, they didn’t receive the fruit itself — they bought a certificate of authenticity giving them the right to recreate the work. If the banana rots, you replace it. The value isn’t in the fruit; it’s in the idea.
After it went viral, everyone argued: “Is this even art?!” Crowds flooded to the contemporary art fair Art Basel in Miami Beach, where it was being exhibited, just to take selfies with the banana. A performance artist named David Datuna walked up, took the banana off the wall, ate it, and called his act “Hungry Artist.” The gallery calmly replaced the banana. The value? Unchanged.
The incident made the point perfectly: the banana didn’t matter, the duct tape didn’t matter — the concept was the art.
I told my brother that Cattelan owns the copyright or intellectual property rights to the idea, and he said he didn’t. We went back and forth about it for a while until I just gave up.
I don’t have any formal knowledge of the law. But I I am sure my brother is wrong. While the piece is absurd, I think it would stop short of charging $120,000 USD for literally nothing. They get something for it — and what they get is the right to reproduce it.


























